Phukan (Akarawat Prathumthong), Paper (Natthaphak Witsiri) and Bell (Sasikarn Singsi) are students at the Faculty of Architecture, Art and Design. To complete an assigned task, they must join a team of three people to develop a school project together as part of the final evaluation of a subject.
Phukan will confess to his friend Bell that he is attracted to Paper, but is not sure whether or not he should declare his love, but he will soon discover that the boy has also developed feelings for him.
The first question one must ask is why there are few students in a classroom at one of the Thai Colleges of Architecture, Art and Design. And from this question, others arise: how in this short, which has no great pretensions, are the two main boys, especially Paper, much more handsome and attractive than his study partner, not perceived as attractive people by their colleagues? feminine? Why aren't they popular with girls? How is it possible that there isn't a fight between the few females in the classroom to have them on their respective teams? Only Paper's table neighbor will invite him, very timidly, to join him, but most likely it will be for the comfort of sharing nearby seats. While Bell, obviously, is already a duo with his friend Phukan, so the only thing missing is the incorporation of another person to make up the required shortlist.
If they are already assigning tasks, it is assumed that the course, even if it is the first year of the degree, has already made some progress. Anyway, by now the students should know each other, at least by their names. How is it possible that they have to resort to text messages in a digital chat to know how to call each other and also serve as an introduction to the viewer?
While they visit museums, exhibitions and art galleries and write the assignment, without the viewer realizing it, which demonstrates the little connection achieved between him and the characters, Phukan's love for Paper blossoms, only to discover that the latter has been loving him for some time. secret.
The actors in 'As Always', a short film by Thai filmmaker Patcharaporn Thiangsantia, do not achieve the necessary control of their bodies and voices to convey the emotions of their characters. Theirs are not empathetic characters, capable of allowing viewers to connect with them and their experiences. The audience does not feel and understand the emotions of the characters, so the emotional connection is null and void. This is where the failure of the audiovisual lies, in addition to its poor script.
Positive emotions such as joy at discovering love (another emotion), humor and happiness (as ways Bell reacts when learning about his friend's sexuality, or when the two boys mutually declare their love for each other), are not transmitted; nor negative emotions such as anxiety, sadness, insecurity, fear of rejection. Likewise, ambiguous emotions, such as surprise at being reciprocated, and hope, are not externalized.
In this minor work of the BL universe, repeated clichés, boring scenes, a non-existent chemistry between the lovers, and childish actions, are its main characteristics in a romance with little to prove to fans of the genre.
The short lacks a convincing plot and shows little imagination, contributing little to the genre, which has come a long way in recent years; If anything, the discovery of two new and potential talents within the BL, but with a lot to polish, as well as demonstrating the rich architectural and plastic arts culture of Thailand.
If what you are looking for is a declaration of love of fireworks and butterflies fluttering in the stomach, of those that are born under the influence of emotions, intoxicated with the nectar of the first months, those in which the loved one seems to be a perfect being and hormones awaken the most lively and intense passions... I repeat, if that is what you are looking for, speaking in baseball terms, pick up the bats and balls and turn off the television, this is not your thing.